Grand Prive poll at CM

tryme1

Affiliate Guard Dog Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
681
Reaction score
58
Well, I doubt there is a single affiliate who is going to vote in favor. And, as they no longer have a player base, they aren't going to get a lot of love there either.

The thing about this is: I'm confused by why there is a vote at CasinoMeister at all. If Casinomeister wants to give them a second chance, then that's their right. When did it become a democracy as there's a bunch of other programs I'd vote into the rogue pit given the chance.
 

Simmo!

Affiliate Guard Dog Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
177
Reaction score
5
Well, I doubt there is a single affiliate who is going to vote in favor. And, as they no longer have a player base, they aren't going to get a lot of love there either.

The thing about this is: I'm confused by why there is a vote at CasinoMeister at all. If Casinomeister wants to give them a second chance, then that's their right. When did it become a democracy as there's a bunch of other programs I'd vote into the rogue pit given the chance.

My bet is that he saw it as a no-win scenario. Give them a 2nd chance and half the industry would be hammering the door down - don't give them another chance and it goes against the remit of CM and precedents previously set.

Seems like a totally sensible call to me.
 

tryme1

Affiliate Guard Dog Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
681
Reaction score
58
Good points, but it feels like a cop out to me.

If the remit of CasinoMeister is to offer a second chance - within the guidelines laid out in the opening post of that thread - then they need to do that. The rest of the industry will chime in one way or another.

Opening out to a public referendum, on the other hand, is just a way to abrogate responsibility for their own site. And that doesn't sound like the Casinomeister way.
 
Top