dominique
Certification Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2006
- Messages
- 1,072
- Reaction score
- 6
Given that the Wire Act does not reach interstate transmissions of wire
communications that do not relate to a “sporting event or contest,” and that
the state-run lotteries proposed by New York and Illinois do not involve
sporting events or contests, we conclude that the Wire Act
does not prohibit the lotteries described in these proposals. In light of that conclusion, we need
not consider how to reconcile the Wire Act with UIGEA, because the Wire Act
does not apply in this situation. Accordingly, we express no view about the proper interpretation or scope of
UIGEA.
If that's what you want to think, be my quest.Take it easy, let's see who will profit from that - I think some Vegas guys, or some state lotteries ... ;(
Given that the Wire Act does not reach interstate transmissions of wire
communications that do not relate to a “sporting event or contest,” and that
the state-run lotteries proposed by New York and Illinois do not involve
sporting events or contests, we conclude that the Wire Act
does not prohibit the lotteries described in these proposals. In light of that conclusion, we need
not consider how to reconcile the Wire Act with UIGEA, because the Wire Act
does not apply in this situation. Accordingly, we express no view about the proper interpretation or scope of
UIGEA.
HOLEY SHIT TIME TO PARTY!!!!!!!!
Even though it is technically legal now, I don't think anything has happened yet with payment processing. As soon as credit cards, bank wires, and the other main payment become legal again, I'm going to celebrate very hard