Warning: Don't let anyone push your slot machine button

[LandofOz]

Did you know that if you allow your friend or any other person to push the button on your slot machine, then that person will be legally entitled to whatever jackpot is struck? I didn't know this until I read about what happened to this poor guy who asked his female friend to push the button on his slot machine for good luck. A $100K jackpot was struck, but she was the one who walked away with the money. I bet he will never ask anyone else to do that for him ever again.
http://www.sweetbet.com/fort-lauder...jackpot-because-his-friend-pushed-the-button/

 

[casinonewbie]

Interesting story indeed. The Seminole Hard Rock Casino in Fort Lauderdale brings back some good memories (from what i remember), have not been their for years it's a great casino spent one to many late nights at the Center Bar ......

 

[BetOnlineUK]

Wow, would that happen if it had been done online? I have watched some streams (Twitch) where friends have been playing on their account

 

[Aeternus]

I know that some streamers, like Letsgiveitaspin, has an agreement with LeoVegas to let other people play for him.

Interesting story by the way, let's hope she did the right thing and gave him back the money.

 

[onlinecasinoscloud1]

It looks like a mess, and it's hard to imagine when you put/bet own money and get nothing !

 

[BetOnlineUK]

I know that some streamers, like Letsgiveitaspin, has an agreement with LeoVegas to let other people play for him.

To be fair LGIS was one I was thinking off along with Casinodaddy (brothers). If it was you or I we would have our accounts closed for sure. I wish them well but what would happen if they hit the jackpot suddenly their agreement disappears.

 

[Guard Dog]

That takes the word 'friend' and gives it a whole new meaning Hope she gave it back, but the crappy thing is that taxes would be applied to her also.

 

[BetOnlineUK]

At $50 a spin I wonder how much was staked before it dropped

 

[i-man]

As a friend i hope she do the right thing. If it's even to split the money 50/50

 

[AussieDave]

"Mr. Jan Flato, 66, and his female friend Marina Navarro, 35"

At $50 a spin, the guy is obviously cashed up.
How many 35 year old women do you know, who hang out with 66 year old guy's? The majority are ALL gold-diggers.

 

[NDG]

35 year old women that hang out with 66 year old guys are normally called "daughters".

 

[NoLuckNeeded]

"Mr. Jan Flato, 66, and his female friend Marina Navarro, 35"

At $50 a spin, the guy is obviously cashed up.
How many 35 year old women do you know, who hang out with 66 year old guy's? The majority are ALL gold-diggers.

I love how it's always the woman who is wrong as opposed to the sad old man with more money than sense who probably traded in hist first wife for a new model when she got too old. Who is the victim in this situation? These old "rich" men who have such low self esteem they feel the need to pay "beautiful" people to hang out with them get exactly what they want, and what they deserve. They are usually very experienced with using and buying people for their own self interests. This man wants to be with someone young enough to be his child, but the woman is morally wrong and he is the victim? Perhaps both parties got exactly what they deserved.

 

[Guard Dog]

Oh, the woman isn't wrong... unless she takes the money lol. But the guy is an idiot if he doesn't know better. JMO! lol. And.... I agree with you 100%. If there was a 200% I would agree with you that much.

 

[KasinoKing]

Oh, the woman isn't wrong... unless she takes the money lol. But the guy is an idiot if he doesn't know better. JMO! lol. And.... I agree with you 100%. If there was a 200% I would agree with you that much.

That's the voice of a younger man - if you were old like me & AussieDave you might have a different perspective on things...

KK

 

[NoLuckNeeded]

My problem is that society vilifies a woman who chooses a mate based on life security (money), while not vilifying a man who chooses a mate based on tits. Which is the nobler way to choose a mate? Is there a morally superior way to choose a mate? Not really. It is not morally wrong for a man to choose a mate based on looks and it is not morally wrong for a woman to choose a mate based on the security a man can provide for her. We are all using each other for something, that is a fact. Perhaps adults should be able to pick their mates based on whatever the hell they wish and we can keep our "gold-digger" and "old pervert" aspersions to ourselves.

That said.. I can think of several men almost twice my age that I'd nail regardless of how much money they have. Perhaps that makes me a "slut" instead of a "gold digger". I can tell you for certain I am a gambler and I'd never let anyone touch a machine I was playing even if they were hot or rich.

 

[ARZ]

Even when I had a pub with land-based slots, there was a rule: the money on slot display belong to the depositor, no matter what is happening. When he left the casino wasted, cash was withdrawed and given to him right after he came again But yes, there was plenty of guys, who enjoyed the company of young ladies, and the young ladies enjoyed spinning the weels In a case of some higher amount has been won, they shared the win by someting like 90% depositor and 10% spinning chick