- Joined
- Dec 15, 2006
- Messages
- 7,647
- Reaction score
- 1,010
Maybe Marten is not there now, would not surprise me this company has a new aff manager every other month just about...
Originally Posted by Minimum Activity ClauseSorry for the delay on this folks... Affiliate Lounge terms are still considered predatory by AGD. Reason is the following term, which is just a re-write of the one that got them in trouble in the first place:
Follow that with the termination clause and it is clear what they are trying to do here.
Hi,
Apologies for the delay but we have discussed internally how to answer all the concerns raised by AWD and its members.
1. Staff turnover in the past
It is true that affiliate lounge has had quite high staff turnover in the past. This has been primarily for individual personal reasons (desire to relocate, continue with studies etc) or, more recently, organisational changes following the acquisition of Betsafe in 2011. Whilst this may be cause for concern for some of our partners, Affiliate Lounge does not necessarily view this as a threat to existing or future partnership profitability. Many of the new staff in the current team are hired internally, bringing with them skills from other departments as well as facilitating the training required to handle Affiliate Lounge matters in a swift manner. High staff turnover is a reality for a fast moving industry like i-gaming and Affiliate Lounge has tackled this market reality by bolstering up the team to 13 persons with an additional 3 persons planned for employment in 2012. With this team in place we have the human resources required to handle and service our partners for the foreseeable future in a swift and professional manner, also catering for future staff replacements. We have also made, and continue to develop, new tools in the Affiliate Lounge system which will allow our affiliates greater independency in terms of report and optimising their promotion of our brands.
2. Minimum activity clause
Affiliate Lounge disagrees that the existing minimum activity clause is a simple rewording of the previous clause. Whilst the previous clause enforced a minimum NDC activity, the existing clause simply states that if the activity associated with a specific affiliate account is low enough so as to not justify its maintenance, then Affiliate Lounge has the option to close the account. Nevertheless, the existing clause offers greater flexibility for the affiliate and does not automatically penalise partners if NDC levels do not reach a minimum level.
Moreover, Affiliate Lounge has also removed the dormant account policy clause, following feedback from key partners, which did cause worry in the past.
We are convinced that today, Affiliate Lounge holds terms and conditions which are fair for both parties involved.
3. Future changes
Affiliate Lounge believes that today we have terms which will remain in place for the foreseeable future. Any changes to the existing terms may occur as a result of external factors such as the regulation of markets, introduction of new brands and gaming taxes or changes in company ownership. The existing terms and conditions are the result of a number of factors which occurred in 2011, namely
1. Listening to feedback from affiliates and partners.
2. The acquisition of betsafe by Betsson group.
3. The reregulation of the Danish gaming market.
Originally Posted by MartenIsaksson
We are convinced that today, Affiliate Lounge holds terms and conditions which are fair for both parties involved.
3. Future changes
Affiliate Lounge believes that today we have terms which will remain in place for the foreseeable future. Any changes to the existing terms may occur as a result of external factors such as the regulation of markets, introduction of new brands and gaming taxes or changes in company ownership. The existing terms and conditions are the result of a number of factors which occurred in 2011, namely
1. Listening to feedback from affiliates and partners.
2. The acquisition of betsafe by Betsson group.
3. The reregulation of the Danish gaming market.
What maintenance? It's just rows in a database; there is no real "maintenance" necessary. If an affiliate has earned more than the minimum payment threshold, you pay him/her; if not, you do nothing.2. Minimum activity clause
Affiliate Lounge disagrees that the existing minimum activity clause is a simple rewording of the previous clause. Whilst the previous clause enforced a minimum NDC activity, the existing clause simply states that if the activity associated with a specific affiliate account is low enough so as to not justify its maintenance, then Affiliate Lounge has the option to close the account. Nevertheless, the existing clause offers greater flexibility for the affiliate and does not automatically penalise partners if NDC levels do not reach a minimum level.
True -- good point.Guard Dog said:Marten... how would you like it if you spent $10,000 promoting AL... then the company said... Sorry Marten - you didn't bring in enough affiliates, we aren't paying you this month or ever again. It's the same thing, really. We spend money to promote your casinos, you then decide not to pay us. It's unethical.
Yep...bonustreak said:you still leave open the chance to shut down an affiliates account on a whim.
What maintenance? It's just rows in a database; there is no real "maintenance" necessary. If an affiliate has earned more than the minimum payment threshold, you pay him/her; if not, you do nothing.
I find their "maintenance" very funny... They call it synchronization and it basically means that the stats are not updated regularly but at different times of the day, sometimes there's even a two-day or a three-day delay.
I almost got one of their AMs to confirm me on the phone that I've referred some users that are not tagged to my affiliate account. I knew the exact details about two players, first time my AM told me these players do not exist at all; then he told me they were referred by another affiliate; then he told me that he can tag them to my account.
This is highly suspicious. If the stats are correct and not manipulated, why aren't they displayed in real time? And why do the AMs claim that they do not have access to all the statistics (and they apparently have to contact another department)?
Yes, AL brands convert well but that's about it! The only thing I trust about their stats is the "hits log" (list of incoming clicks to their sites). The rest is very strange...
Wow, this was a bit surprising.Hi tobbe,
We would like to see if there's anything we can do for you. Could you please PM me your affiliate username so we can have a look at it?
Best Regards