Playamo Partners NEW Audit Report

[Guard Dog]

Hello AGD community,

Today we present to you the real new revenue share audit report for Playamo Partners.
The results of the first audit report done in 2019 can be seen here.

They have Playamo Casino as one of their brands.

Affiliate Reporting Platform: NetRefer

Best Bitcoin & Real Money Casino | PlayAmo Online Casino

Play the best online casino PlayAmo.com for Bitcoin or Real Money! Over 2000 Slots, Roulette, BlackJack & Poker with free bonuses and friendly support!

www.affiliateguarddog.com

Admin fee figure found in terms and conditions/or on the website:
Exact admin fee is not stated in the affiliate program T&C
““Net Gaming Revenue” or “NGR” means all monies received by Company from New Customers as placed bets, less (a) winnings returned to New Customers, (b) issued bonuses, (c) net balance corrections, (d) administration fees, (e) fraud costs and chargebacks. For the avoidance of doubt, all Net Gaming Revenue amounts mentioned above are only related to New Customers referred to Company Websites by the Affiliate Website(s).”

Test signup and deposit is made from the Country ‘Norway’ since Serbia is one of the restricted countries at the casino.

We deposited €20 / 0.00095 via BTC and took a welcome offer of 100%.

Our balance with the welcome offer was €41.76 and we started playing some slots:

Eventually, we lost all the funds and checked the earnings report:

For the deposit of €20.88 the Net Gaming Revenue was €11.44

To summarize, the Effective Net Gaming Revenue (the amount of money deposited and lost) is 11.44/20.88= 54.79%.

Finally, multiply the advertised revenue share rate with the Effective NGR to see your real revenue share rate, e.g:

• 25% = 13.70 %
• 30% = 16.43 %
• 35% = 19.18 %
• 40% = 21.92 %
• 45% = 24.65 %

 

[Dragao69]

Even crapier results, as expected!

10% less of ENGR than 3 years ago. Next Step: -20%!

 

[NPM]

Sneaky! Was rubbish earlier, and now even more rubbish

 

[TTR]

Why u always take a bonus while doing audit? what for? Or do without or do few times with bonus and without, otherwise seems very useless and unprofessional

 

[Kadabra]

I assume they are doing with bonus as most players do take bonus so that presents the most common case.

And 54% for grey market brand is pretty much the lowest i've seen.

 

[Biti]

Rubbish program. High fees, bad retention due untagging and cross-selling.

 

[bettingparlour]

I've noticed this with my stats and was always curious. Now I know they've been pocketing heaps!

 

[eenzoo]

Its a shame.

 

[AussieDave]

I assume they are doing with bonus as most players do take bonus so that presents the most common case.

Personally, it's an affiliate's best interests, to try and convince your players to NOT take a bonus. Most of these browsers based casinos are placing 40x if not more on the wagering.

Not to mention, limiting the max bet, usually it's max $5 (or whenever currency used). If those two bonus rules weren't enough, they also bonus-ban certain slots.

While it's not 'mission impossible' to met a 40x wagering, I dare say most players bomb out well before.

And given that most of these casinos offer bonuses throughout the week, then your getting screwed every time a player takes a bonus. Win Win for casino, ongoing shafting for affiliates