- Joined
- Dec 17, 2006
- Messages
- 6,960
- Reaction score
- 7
The Affiliate Management team has been notified of the new post.
Ed@TradaAffiliates - As I'm sure you can appreciate, not only is it immensely frustrating to try and operate an affiliate business on unreliable stats, but worse (as jono78 points out) when affiliates voice bona fide concerns about these flakey-stats to the IA Rep et al, nothing is resolved. Instead, just more semantics and circle-jerking follows.
Frankly you'd get more sense from discussing the IA issues, with a generic-house-brick!
After thought... Now that Paysafe Group own IA, affiliates "trust" factor has, once more, been deflated further. Conflicts of Interest are riff between the aforementioned companies. Whether personal player data is shared or not is a moot point.
Not long after PaySafe Group aquired Income Access, affiliates started to receive offical legal notices from a UK Gov., Dept., tied to unlawful email/sms marketing practices, in which these affiliates were threatned with legal action.
How did that Dept., aquire that personal affiliate data? Income Access was firstly approached by the UK Gov., Dept. And, subsequently to deflect the heat per se, its been purported that IA freely handed over that information (affiliates personal data).
Similar BS story used by casinos etc, when dealing with in-house-spam. They claim it's sent from a rogue affiliate(s).
Thing is, the majority of affiliates who received those legal letters, do not promote online gambling venues to the UK. So clearly this UK Gov., Dept., didn't conduct any type of research & or investigation into pin-pointing affiliates responsible. More reason to believe, IA opted to throw affiliates under the truck wheels!.
At the end of the day (ED & Rachel) affiliates hold Tradaffiliates in good standing. It would seem to be a real shame, that the ethical work you've all done so far, could, and quite possibly be undermined, if this transistion and move to IA was to go ahead.
I will close with this... Just because it's a good business decision, doesn't always mean it's the right choice.
Must be a reason for this madness from Trada, hey no skin off my nose as i have never promoted them & never will with this form. But i will bet my left gonad this is not in the best interests of affiliates. It also would not surprise me as PaySafe have got a sweet taste for being an "affiliate" they will soon be owning casinos also.@Ed & Rachel - I wish you all the best with that.
Wouldn't be my choice, but, it's not my company. Sure hope this decision doesn't come back to bite. Worse case scenario, AffVantage et al becomes another affiliate program working with IA. In which case, most affiliates are running in the oposite direction.
I still don't buy the best for affiliates angle. When, there is just as worthy software like NetRefer, Egass and others. Just seems very odd, to pick a platform that has been embroiled in continue dramas for the past few years. And, is now operated by a company, who holds a monopoly on gambling web wallets. Which btw, that company (PaySafe), holds little to no respect for the bona fide truth.
What everyone needs to remember about IA is that it is a platform. If the customer (i.e., affiliate program) doesn't implement it correctly - it will fail. They have to pass in the data correctly for it to display the data correctly. Their updates have to conform to a specification... I'm not saying IA is good, but with *ANY* affiliate platform - if you do not implement it correctly, it will not be accurate.
Can someone tell me in short sentences, FACTS detailing exactly what is wrong with the IA reporting system?
I personally always found it the best & easiest to use, with all the key data displayed better than virtually all other back-ends.
(Quick Summary Report)
KK
What everyone needs to remember about IA is that it is a platform. If the customer (i.e., affiliate program) doesn't implement it correctly - it will fail. They have to pass in the data correctly for it to display the data correctly.